Close
Learning Methods
Classroom
A traditional classroom couples on-site learning with the added value of face-to-face interaction with instructors and peers. With courses and exams scheduled worldwide, you will be sure to find a class near you.
Interaction
Highly Interactive
On-going interaction with instructor throughout the entire classroom event
Interaction with peers/professionals via face-to-face
Components (May Include)
Onsite
On-site instructor-led delivery of course modules, discussions, exercises, case studies, and application opportunities
Supplemental learning elements such as: audio/video files, tools and templates, articles and/or white papers
E-course materials available two weeks prior to the course start date; printed course materials ship directly to the event location
Duration
One + Days
Varies by course ranging from one to multiple days
Technical Needs
Specific requirements are clearly noted on the course page
Virtual Classroom
Ideal for those who appreciate live education instruction, but looking to save on travel. A virtual classroom affords you many of the same learning benefits as traditional–all from the convenience of your office.
Interaction
Highly Interactive
On-going interaction with instructor throughout the entire virtual classroom event
Interaction with peers/professionals via online environment
Components (May Include)
Live online instructor-led delivery of course modules, discussions, exercises, case studies, and application opportunities
Supplemental learning elements such as: audio/video files, tools and templates, articles and/or white papers
E-course materials available up to one week prior to the course start date. Recorded playback and supplemental materials available up to seven days after the live event.
Duration
Varies by course ranging from one to multiple sessions
Technical Needs
Adobe Flash Player
Acrobat Reader
Computer with sound capability and high-speed internet access
Phone line access
E-Learning
A self-paced, online learning experience that allows you to study any time of day. Course material is pre-recorded by an instructor and you have the flexibility to view content modules as desired.
Interaction
Independent Learning
Components (May Include)
Pre-Recorded
Pre-recorded course modules
Supplemental learning elements such as: audio/video files, online quizzes
E-course materials are available online within one business day of purchase
Optional purchased print material ships within 7 business days
Duration
120 Days - Anytime
120-day access to e-course materials available online within one business day from the date of purchase
Direct access to all components
Technical Needs
Adobe Flash Player
Acrobat Reader
Computer with sound capability and high-speed internet access
Close
Contact Sponsor
E-Reward
Online
Paul Thompson
Phone: 1 44 01614322584
Contact by Email | Website
Close
Sorry, you can't add this item to the cart.
You have reached the maximum allowed quantity for purchase in your cart or the item isn't available anymore.
Product successfully added to your cart!
Price
View your cart
Continue shopping
Please note our website will be down this Friday, November 5 from 9pm ET – 11pm ET for routine maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience.
WORKSPAN
WORKSPAN DAILY |

Collective Bargaining Agreements Ensures Equal Pay for U.S. Soccer Players

052022-soccer780x450-SM.png

The culmination of what NBC News described as a “yearslong fight for equal pay,” U.S. Soccer and the American women’s and men’s national teams have come to collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) intended “to close the gender pay gap and assure every player, man or woman, is paid equally.” 

The two CBAs run through 2028, with economic terms including identical compensation for all competitions, including the FIFA World Cup and the introduction of the same commercial revenue sharing mechanism for both teams, according to a statement from U.S. Soccer, which says the agreements ensure that U.S. Soccer’s senior national team players “remain among the highest paid in the world.” 

The new agreements also improve non-economic terms, including player health and safety, data privacy and “the need to balance responsibilities to both club and country,” according to U.S. Soccer. 

“This is a truly historic moment. These agreements have changed the game forever here in the United States and have the potential to change the game around the world,” said U.S. Soccer President Cindy Parlow Cone.

Under the terms, World Cup prize money will also be pooled between the men’s and women’s teams and split equally among all players, representing a first in federation soccer. 

“I am feeling extreme pride,” U.S. Women’s National Team defender Becky Sauerbrunn told NBC’s "Today" show. “To be able to say, finally, equal pay for equal work feels very, very good.” 

JPMorgan Shareholders Disapprove of CEO's Stock Option Award

In what Reuters described as “an unusual rebuke” for JPMorgan Chase & Co. CEO Jamie Dimon, the company’s shareholders disapproved of the special $52.6 million stock option award that JPMorgan directors gave him in 2021 as an incentive for Dimon to stay on the job for at least five more years. 

In an advisory say-on-pay referendum, only 31% of votes cast endorsed JPMorgan executive payments for 2021, according to a preliminary count announced at the company's annual meeting, reported Reuters, which noted that JPMorgan had won approval from more than 90% of votes cast in its annual compensation ballots in eight of the past 12 years. 

Dimon will keep the award, “but such votes are closely followed as a test of investors’ attitudes toward executive pay and what payouts they will tolerate.” 

In response to the vote, JPMorgan directors “pointed out through a spokesman the special award was extremely rare and the first for Dimon in more than a decade,” Reuters reported. 

Directors said before the vote that the special award “reflects the board’s desire for him to continue to lead the firm for a further significant number of years,” adding that the board made the award in consideration of Dimon’s performance, his leadership since taking over as JPMorgan CEO in 2005 and his proficiency at “management succession planning amidst a highly competitive landscape for executive leadership talent.” 

Intel Shareholders Vote Against Top Executives’ Compensation

According to a recently published regulatory filing, Intel shareholders have voted against the company’s compensation for its top executives, as reported by CNBC

The vote is advisory and won’t have an immediate effect on the compensation of Intel’s executives, but it “sends a signal that some Intel investors are closely watching the performance of CEO Pat Gelsinger and the progress of his turnaround plan for the chip giant,” CNBC’s Kif Leswing wrote. 

Overall, shareholders representing about 34% of the shares voted for the package, CNBC reported. Among those voting, shareholders representing about 920 million shares voted to approve, and those representing 1.77 billion voted against it, in “the latest example of shareholders voting against executive compensation packages, which can include hundreds of millions of dollars in company stock.” 

Since taking over as Intel CEO in February 2021, Gelsinger has “embarked on a mission to turn Intel around, as the once-dominant chipmaker has fallen behind in manufacturing as has started to lose market share to rival AMD,” Leswing wrote. In 2021, Gelsinger received a compensation package worth more than $178 million, including more than $1 million in salary, a $1.75 million bonus, more than $140 million in stock awards and close to $30 million in option awards. 

“The Compensation Committee believed that having 73% of the CEO’s new-hire equity awards contingent on achieving ambitious stock price growth was in the best interest of Intel and its stockholders,” the company noted in its proxy filing. 

“The Committee took the outcome of this vote seriously and was highly focused on gathering and responding to our stockholders’ feedback regarding Intel’s executive compensation programs.” 

Apple Holds Off on Return-to-Work Plans

As Yahoo! and other outlets have reported, Apple Inc. has delayed a plan that would require workers to come back to the office three days a week, citing a resurgence in COVID-19 cases. 

On May 17, the tech giant informed employees that the company is holding off on the requirement, which was set to go into effect on May 23. Still, Apple is expecting employees to come to the office two days per week, saying that the three-day requirement is being set aside “for the time being,” without providing a new target date. 

The company was set to oblige employees to begin working from the office on Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays, “a policy that had been controversial among some staff,” Yahoo! reported. “Already, employees have been coming in two days a week as part of a ramp-up effort that began in April. For now, that mandate isn’t changing.” 

While the delay is COVID-related, “some Apple employees have complained about the return-to-work plan, saying it limits productivity,” Yahoo!’s Mark Gurman wrote. “They’ve said that commute time takes away hours that could be put toward their work. Employees have also complained that the office return ignored the lack of a vaccine for young children.” 


About WorldatWork

WorldatWork is a professional nonprofit association that sets the agenda and standard of excellence in the field of Total Rewards. Our membership, signature certifications, data, content, and conferences are designed to advance our members’ leadership, and to help them influence great outcomes for their own organizations.

About Membership

Membership provides access to practical resources, research, emerging trends, a professional network, and career-building education and certification. Learn more and join today.