Close
Learning Methods
Classroom
A traditional classroom couples on-site learning with the added value of face-to-face interaction with instructors and peers. With courses and exams scheduled worldwide, you will be sure to find a class near you.
Interaction
Highly Interactive
On-going interaction with instructor throughout the entire classroom event
Interaction with peers/professionals via face-to-face
Components (May Include)
Onsite
On-site instructor-led delivery of course modules, discussions, exercises, case studies, and application opportunities
Supplemental learning elements such as: audio/video files, tools and templates, articles and/or white papers
E-course materials available two weeks prior to the course start date; printed course materials ship directly to the event location
Duration
One + Days
Varies by course ranging from one to multiple days
Technical Needs
Specific requirements are clearly noted on the course page
Virtual Classroom
Ideal for those who appreciate live education instruction, but looking to save on travel. A virtual classroom affords you many of the same learning benefits as traditional–all from the convenience of your office.
Interaction
Highly Interactive
On-going interaction with instructor throughout the entire virtual classroom event
Interaction with peers/professionals via online environment
Components (May Include)
Live online instructor-led delivery of course modules, discussions, exercises, case studies, and application opportunities
Supplemental learning elements such as: audio/video files, tools and templates, articles and/or white papers
E-course materials available up to one week prior to the course start date. Recorded playback and supplemental materials available up to seven days after the live event.
Duration
Varies by course ranging from one to multiple sessions
Technical Needs
Adobe Flash Player
Acrobat Reader
Computer with sound capability and high-speed internet access
Phone line access
E-Learning
A self-paced, online learning experience that allows you to study any time of day. Course material is pre-recorded by an instructor and you have the flexibility to view content modules as desired.
Interaction
Independent Learning
Components (May Include)
Pre-Recorded
Pre-recorded course modules
Supplemental learning elements such as: audio/video files, online quizzes
E-course materials start on the day of purchase
Optional purchased print material ships within 7 business days
Duration
120 Days - Anytime
120-day access starts on the day of purchase
Direct access to all components
Technical Needs
Adobe Flash Player
Acrobat Reader
Computer with sound capability and high-speed internet access
Close
Contact Sponsor
E-Reward
Online
Paul Thompson
Phone: 1 44 01614322584
Contact by Email | Website
Close
Sorry, you can't add this item to the cart.
You have reached the maximum allowed quantity for purchase in your cart or the item isn't available anymore.
Product successfully added to your cart!
Price
View your cart
Continue shopping
Please note our website will be down this Friday, November 5 from 9pm ET – 11pm ET for routine maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience.
WORKSPAN
WORKSPAN DAILY |

Quota Busters: How to Address Blowout Sales Comp Payments


052721-quota-780x450

ill Oxford / iStock

Editor’s Note: Workspan Daily will be publishing a monthly sales compensation column from the Alexander Group for the benefit of our readers and to encourage further discourse on topics vital to compensation professionals. New to WorldatWork? Please feel free to join the discussion in our Online Community or send your thoughts to workspan@worldatwork.org.

Finance poses this question: “Explain again, why the salesperson should get this giant check?”

The vice president of sales responds: “This big order blew out the salesperson’s quota!”

Finance: “So, how did that occur?”

You know what happened. The seller brought in a mega deal no one expected — not even the salesperson. As written, the sales compensation plan pays as a percent of quota achievement. This one deal puts the seller’s quota achievement beyond the moon.

Oops! The quota was set too low. The calculated incentive payment is epic! Now what?

Sound familiar? There are several reasons why quotas are not set “correctly.” The first example is our case here — the unexpected mega deal. However, there are additional scenarios that can cause quota errors: poor quota allocation, unpredictable markets, new product launches and unexpected economic trends such as the looming snapback 2021 fiscal year. These scenarios should have policy practices to address each of these occurrences. Rest assured, solutions are provided below.

Capping the sales compensation plan is not one of those solutions, as that has its own negative issues.


052721-quota-780x450


Quotas and Sales Compensation

Quotas are an effective tool used by sales management to assign sales goals to sellers. The process begins before the start of the fiscal year when the business units and corporate finance develop the revenue growth estimate for the next fiscal year. Once confirmed, this number passes to sales management as next year’s fiscal sales objective. Using one of numerous methods, sales management assigns this objective to sellers through a process known as quota allocation. Each salesperson has an assigned sales goal for the year. Of interest, about 50% of all sales departments “over assign” the sales objective so that the summation of sellers’ goals exceeds the corporate commitment. This over-assignment amount is normally 5% or less.  

Quotas have an important implication for sales compensation. Most sales compensation programs create a payout rate to achieve target incentive payment for achieving the sales quota. This means territories of dissimilar size will receive the same incentive earnings, even though the actual revenue amounts differ. Either using individual commission rates (ICRs) or a payout formula tied to percent of goal achievement, the outcome ensures that similar difficulty (not actual revenue) earns the same payout. A seller with a quota of $2.5 million would earn the same incentive as a seller with a $3.2 million quota.

Goal-based pay programs are typical for sales representatives. However, producers (not sales representatives) are paid a commission on all sales, regardless of quota or territory size. Examples of producers include real estate agents, stockbrokers, manufacturers’ representatives, and multi-level marketing sellers. Meanwhile, the pay program for sales representatives is a managed pay program with low performers earning below target incentive and high performers earning above target incentive.

But goal setting is not easy. Companies struggle with this inexact process each year. The Alexander Group’s annual sales compensation trends survey confirms that quota allocation is the most challenging element of sales compensation management. It has been the No. 1 challenge for 19 consecutive years, spanning the full history of the survey.

Quota Challenges and Solutions

Knowing that the pay program is linked to the quota system, sales management should anticipate and address the following known quota challenges.

  • Poor Quota Allocation Process. There is no excuse for a flawed quota allocation process. It needs to be as timely, disciplined and accurate as possible.

Solution: Invest in the quota allocation process. Work with product management and finance before setting the fiscal year number to ensure soundness of the fiscal year forecast. Involve field personnel to help estimate revenue growth. Use external data to estimate market growth potential by territory. Have field management vet the numbers. Do not use the previous year’s performance plus a universal percent increase for all territories. This approach will cause distortions. Don’t grossly over assign the number.

  • Unpredictable Markets. Some markets have unpredictable revenue performance. In such cases, a one-year quota might be as good as a random guess. New markets are particularly hard to estimate.

Solution: Shorten the quota period to half year or quarterly when future revenue performance has better visibility. Another solution uses rolling quotas — the last three months of trending performance equal next month’s quota — for markets that change based on factors outside the company’s control, like commodity markets.

  • New Product Launches. Often, the prospects for a new product do not always conform to product management’s estimates. Including the new product in the annual quota could skew results either positively or negatively.

Solution: Unless product management has a proven record of accurately predicting new product release dates and first-year performance, keep the new products out of the annual quota. Use contests, spiffs or special incentives to reward new product selling. Only include the product's revenue in the annual quota after the sales team confirms the market’s appetite for the new product.

  • Unforeseen Events. Sometimes, management’s assigned quotas are made meaningless by an unexpected event such as a recession, pandemic or product recall. These events could render the quotas meaningless.

Solution: Adopt a defined policy of what could cause quotas to be reset midyear. Use trigger performance levels to delineate when quotas will be modified across the sales force. If average quota performance falls below 85% to quota or exceeds 125% to quota, sales management will close the current program and make pro rata payments; new quotas will be set for the remainder of the year.

  • Unexpected Mega Deals. Most sellers and their managers have good insight into what business will occur during the quota performance period. The quota was set using these understandings of territory potential. However, occasionally an unexpected mega deal appears that dwarfs the current quota. When calculated, the pay program will create an unanticipated blockbuster payment.

Solution: Include a mega deal policy in the pay program. These policies limit the amount of revenue that is applied to quota achievement with the excess being paid a lower, more modest payout. An alternative approach is to have all pending deals “registered” in the CRM system. These deals will be part of the quota. Non-registered deals are paid under the mega-deal policy.

2021 Fiscal Year

At this point in 2021, revenue performance for some companies is growing at a greater rate than anticipated. The post-pandemic economy is picking up speed. Maybe you work for one of these companies. Congratulations! However, what does this unexpected revenue success mean for sales compensation payments at your company? It means rich payouts! As many sellers exceed their quotas, expect payouts to be higher than anticipated. Is this considered bad? More incentive pay for more revenue seems like a fair bargain. However, this is not how the sellers’ pay plan was supposed to work.

The simple truth is sales management did not set tough enough quotas at the start of the fiscal year. Who could blame them? Few expected such a robust revenue year.

Maybe you have the mega order situation we began with. Or your results are going to exceed your 2021 quotas. Let’s assume, unfortunately, you do not have policies in place to protect the quota/pay system. The results are unintended high payouts. What do you do?

The answer: You and your lawyers will have to think this through. My lawyers told me to keep my suggestions to myself.

About the Author

David Cichelli Bio Image

David Cichelli is a revenue growth advisor for the Alexander Group. Connect with him on LinkedIn.