Close
Learning Methods
Classroom
A traditional classroom couples on-site learning with the added value of face-to-face interaction with instructors and peers. With courses and exams scheduled worldwide, you will be sure to find a class near you.
Interaction
Highly Interactive
On-going interaction with instructor throughout the entire classroom event
Interaction with peers/professionals via face-to-face
Components (May Include)
Onsite
On-site instructor-led delivery of course modules, discussions, exercises, case studies, and application opportunities
Supplemental learning elements such as: audio/video files, tools and templates, articles and/or white papers
E-course materials available two weeks prior to the course start date; printed course materials ship directly to the event location
Duration
One + Days
Varies by course ranging from one to multiple days
Technical Needs
Specific requirements are clearly noted on the course page
Virtual Classroom
Ideal for those who appreciate live education instruction, but looking to save on travel. A virtual classroom affords you many of the same learning benefits as traditional–all from the convenience of your office.
Interaction
Highly Interactive
On-going interaction with instructor throughout the entire virtual classroom event
Interaction with peers/professionals via online environment
Components (May Include)
Live online instructor-led delivery of course modules, discussions, exercises, case studies, and application opportunities
Supplemental learning elements such as: audio/video files, tools and templates, articles and/or white papers
E-course materials available up to one week prior to the course start date. Recorded playback and supplemental materials available up to seven days after the live event.
Duration
Varies by course ranging from one to multiple sessions
Technical Needs
Adobe Flash Player
Acrobat Reader
Computer with sound capability and high-speed internet access
Phone line access
E-Learning
A self-paced, online learning experience that allows you to study any time of day. Course material is pre-recorded by an instructor and you have the flexibility to view content modules as desired.
Interaction
Independent Learning
Components (May Include)
Pre-Recorded
Pre-recorded course modules
Supplemental learning elements such as: audio/video files, online quizzes
E-course materials start on the day of purchase
Optional purchased print material ships within 7 business days
Duration
120 Days - Anytime
120-day access starts on the day of purchase
Direct access to all components
Technical Needs
Adobe Flash Player
Acrobat Reader
Computer with sound capability and high-speed internet access
Close
Contact Sponsor
E-Reward
Online
Paul Thompson
Phone: 1 44 01614322584
Contact by Email | Website
Close
Sorry, you can't add this item to the cart.
You have reached the maximum allowed quantity for purchase in your cart or the item isn't available anymore.
Product successfully added to your cart!
Price
View your cart
Continue shopping
Please note our website will be down this Friday, November 5 from 9pm ET – 11pm ET for routine maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience.
WORKSPAN
WORKSPAN DAILY |

SEC Proposes Rule Amendments That Change Human Capital Reporting

The Securities and Exchange Commission is proposing that organizations should start disclosing a description of their human capital. 

Image

The SEC recently announced that it voted to propose rule amendments to modernize the description of business, legal proceedings and risk factor disclosures that organizations are required to make pursuant to Regulation S-K. Currently, public companies are only required to report on staff size and executive compensation.

The proposed rule amendments come from a push by the Human Capital Management Coalition (HCMC) and the SEC’s Disclosure Effectiveness Review and Modernization project. Various studies show that organizations are enjoying increases in their market values from intangible assets like human capital. However, there is not investor clarity on how to assess this value at individual organizations. 

Despite the obvious impact human capital management (HCM) has on a company’s bottom line, the proposal could meet some resistance from these public companies, according to Don Delves, Andrew Goldstein, Ryan Resch and Steve Seelig of Willis Towers Watson.

“We’ve long been a proponent of many of the committee’s ideas and have done considerable research on how HCM can positively impact company performance,” they wrote in an executive compensation bulletin. “We are mindful, however, that some companies would find mandatory disclosures onerous, particularly when they’ve not focused previously on HCM or have a different perspective on the key measures that are deemed important to their success.”

The SEC’s proposal would replace the existing requirements to disclose only the number of employees with a principles-based requirement to disclose, to the extent material, a “description of the registrant’s human capital resources, including in such description any human capital measures or objectives that management focuses on in managing the business (such as, depending on the nature of the registrant’s business and workforce, measures or objectives that address the attraction, development, and retention of personnel).” The exact measures or objectives discussed in a company’s disclosure could change over time and vary with the industry. Instead of specific line item disclosures, the proposal provides non-exclusive examples of potentially material human capital measures and objectives, wrote Cydney Posner of Cooley.  

The release asked for comment on whether the SEC should add more examples of measures or objectives that may be material, such as the number of full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary workers; voluntary and involuntary turnover rates; measures regarding average hours of training per employee per year; information regarding human capital trends, such as competitive conditions and internal rates of hiring and promotion; measures regarding worker productivity; and the progress that management has made with respect to any objectives it has set regarding its human capital resources.

Willis Towers Watson noted that if the process of how a company’s human capital is being managed ends up in the proxy, the compensation committee will be tasked with understanding how that works, whether the process is sound and perhaps even offering its view on new directions.

“We don’t think this means the compensation committee will set workforce pay, but it may now participate in the oversight of the company’s compensation philosophy and strategies, and other questions of pay fairness, inclusion and diversity policies, and hiring and retention strategies currently outside of its purview,” wrote Delves, Resch, Goldstein and Seelig. “Previously, we’ve forecast that the urging from numerous stakeholders on HCM issues would lead to an expansion of the compensation committee’s role and have recommended ways to respond to these demands.” 

The proposal is currently in a 60-day public comment period. 

About the Author

Brett Christie Bio Image

Brett Christie is a staff writer at WorldatWork.


About WorldatWork

WorldatWork is a professional nonprofit association that sets the agenda and standard of excellence in the field of Total Rewards. Our membership, signature certifications, data, content, and conferences are designed to advance our members’ leadership, and to help them influence great outcomes for their own organizations.

About Membership

Membership provides access to practical resources, research, emerging trends, a professional network, and career-building education and certification. Learn more and join today.