Why the CEO Needs to Own Company Culture
Reads” is a space for articles and personal essays meant to be
thought-provoking and informative for human resources professionals, from
sharing the “human” perspectives on workplace issues to book reviews of
business titles we find inspiring. Have an essay or blog post to share? Contact
us at email@example.com.
In 2020 and in the wake of George
Floyd’s murder, we bore witness to unparalleled outrage, intense advocacy and
even first-time recognition of inequality by friends, family, politicians,
communities, institutions and colleagues. We also saw people — and companies —
take a stand in ways they might not have previously.
Now, as the country begins to go back
to normal post-pandemic, the question on many peoples’ minds is the same: what
happens now? Will companies continue to advocate for social justice, equity or
politics? Or was it all lip service?
As employees ask themselves these
questions, it’s time for CEOs to look inward as well and truthfully ask: am I
virtue-signaling and relying on HR to tackle these issues? Or am I stepping up
and taking ownership of our response?
From a macro view, it’s the CEO’s
primary job to champion an environment where all points of view are welcomed.
On the flip side of the coin, leaders need to align cultural values with
corporate and employee advocacy — sometimes requiring them to take a position
that is not universally accepted. This was particularly true in 2020 as the
pandemic became highly politicized and our presidential election deeply
While it’s easier for CEOs to
rationalize doing nothing by citing a sense of obligation to being a neutral
party, this was a time when that simply was not realistic, empathetic or strategic.
As the nation reopens in COVID’s wake,
some companies are experiencing unprecedented voluntary turnover. And while
corporate social activism perhaps wasn’t the only reason for making a change,
people are most definitely rethinking the connection between their careers and
their values. People who feel their employer failed to take a stance might
leave for a company with a louder voice, while employees who disagree with a
stance a company takes are also at a high risk for turnover.
So, isn’t this really an HR issue?
Shouldn’t the CEO delegate all things in the “employee activism” category to
the head of human resources? Is it really the CEO’s responsibility to take the
The answer is a resounding no. As a
leader, it’s the CEO who needs to define and support an open culture that
values diverse ideas and a wide range of thinking. A culture where employees
know that their opinion — when expressed appropriately in the workplace — has
significance, and a culture where silence is unacceptable.
Of course, HR does have a substantial
role in supporting cultural changes. Putting programs in place to advance
points of view and give each employee a “voice” is part of diversity, equity
and inclusion work. Educating employees about the existence of seminal events like
Juneteenth is part of learning and development. And these initiatives do not
stop at the borders; these same delivery mechanisms can be used to help
employees understand what it’s like to be an Indian American, non-native
English speaker, or woman in the workplace.
Discomfort somehow lands at HR’s door.
Often, it’s because CEOs feel they need to be neutral. Looking at it from the
employees’ vantage point adds a dimension to which many CEOs might not be
sensitive. The workforce wants to work for a leader who cares, someone who
applauds those who step up and make the workplace (and the world) better, and
one who inspires trust and engagement from employees.
Left or right, Black or White,
appreciating opinions and fervency helps build a strong culture, and that’s the
About the Author
Dunivan is the CEO of Namely.