DEI and HR: What Is the Function’s Role One Year Since the Rollback?

It has been a little more than a year since the visible rollback of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs. During the past 12-plus months, many organizations have quietly rebranded, reframed or retreated from their efforts related to the goal of equitable and diverse workplaces. The underlying expectations from employees, applicants, regulators and investors have not gone away, though. If anything, the gap between public signalling and lived experience has widened, and the HR function is standing in that vacuum.

This article examines the current state of this subject (whether it’s called DEI, equitable and diverse workplaces, or some other moniker) and scrutinizes its interplay with HR’s role, activities and outcomes.

From Program Owner to Risk Navigator

To quantify the current state, the first step is recognizing that DEI is now as much a risk conversation as it is a values conversation. Legal challenges, political pressure and activist investors have pushed some organizations to scale back or dismantle DEI teams, commitments and public reporting. At the same time, some research reports show employees remain more likely to join and stay with organizations that prioritize equity and inclusion and will walk away when they see those commitments quietly dropped.

That tension has repositioned HR. No longer simply “running DEI programs,” the function is navigating the legal and political scrutiny of anything labelled “DEI,” balancing the risk that values-driven employees from underrepresented groups will disengage or leave, and the risk of reputational damage among customers, partners and communities.

HR’s role has traditionally been to hold the mirror up and make sure any changes to DEI strategy are deliberate, evidence-based and transparent, not simply reactive.

From Slogans to Systems

The second step is moving from performative commitments to systemic change. Over the last year, some organizations have reduced related branding and external reporting, as they quietly repurpose work under different labels, such as “fair pay,” “workforce representation” or “career well-being.”

This is where HR should insist on substance over semantics. Whether or not the “DEI” label survives, the core work should be to:

Build evidence-based pay and progression structures that reduce inequities.
Audit talent practices for bias across attraction, hiring, development and exits.
Ensure employee resource groups (ERGs), mentoring and sponsorship don’t disappear in cost-cutting rounds because their value isn’t easily captured on a spreadsheet.

In practice, this means HR reframing what had been known as DEI to instead revolve around critical infrastructure that impacts rewards, performance management, leadership development and workforce planning. When HR leads with data — for example, showing how cuts to ERGs, flexible working policies or targeted development are impacting retention of under‑represented groups — the conversation moves from ideology to outcomes.

The strategic pivot is from HR owning DEI to HR enabling accountability.

From ‘Owning DEI’ to Enabling Accountability

It is clear that DEI-focused teams can be vulnerable when budgets tighten or political rhetoric changes. Many organizations disbanded DEI after 2024, while others hollowed the function out. HR can’t afford to have inclusion dependent on a single team or job title.

The strategic pivot is from HR owning DEI to HR enabling accountability. This includes:

Building DEI-relevant metrics into leadership scorecards and reward structures.
Equipping managers with tools, training and data to manage inclusion in their teams.
Designing approaches that withstand scrutiny and still move the dial.

This “distributed ownership” model doesn’t remove HR from the equation; it elevates HR into the role of architect and challenger. The function creates the frameworks, guardrails and insights that allow leaders to make inclusive decisions, even in a politically charged environment.

From Backlash Management to Talent Strategy

The narrative around DEI backlash often frames inclusion as a reputational liability. HR needs to recenter DEI as a core talent and performance strategy. Insights in Workspan Daily and other publications show that large segments of the workforce (particularly Generation Z, millennials and historically marginalized groups) actively screen employers for credible DEI commitments and are willing to leave when those commitments evaporate.

In a labor market where skills shortages coexist with economic uncertainty, HR’s role should be to:

Connect DEI decisions directly to attraction, engagement and retention outcomes.
Use internal and external data to show how diverse, inclusive teams correlate with innovation, customer insight and resilience.
Challenge cost-cutting decisions that treat DEI as expendable, highlighting the longer-term cost of turnover, lost engagement and narrowed talent pipelines.

When HR frames DEI rollbacks as a risk to workforce capability and brand, not merely a political signal, the conversation in the C-suite shifts.

From One-Size-Fits-All to Intersectional Practice

The past year has generally exposed who feels expendable when DEI is deprioritized. Employees at the intersections of race, gender, disability, class and sexuality are often the first to experience the effects when inclusive practices are eroded.

HR has a responsibility to:

Maintain intersectional data and insight — not just tracking “women” or “marginalized groups” in aggregate, but understanding how different groups are experiencing career progression, workload, hybrid work and well-being.
Keep focus on issues that have been highly politicized (e.g., racial equity, LGBTQ+ inclusion, disability) by anchoring them in health, safety, equal treatment and dignity at work.
Protect listening mechanisms (i.e., surveys, listening circles, safe reporting routes) so early warning signs don’t get lost as organizations “go quiet” on DEI externally.

In other words, HR’s role is not only to steward the majority experience but to keep sight of those whose voices are easiest to ignore when the rhetoric turns hostile.

So, What Is HR’s Role, A Year On?

A year after the visible DEI rollbacks, HR’s role may be summed up in five verbs: clarify, connect, challenge, calibrate and continue.

Clarify: Be explicit about what, if anything, has changed in your organization’s DEI commitments and why. Ambiguity likely breeds distrust.
Connect: Tie inclusion decisions to talent, risk and performance, using external benchmarks and internal data to ground the conversation.
Challenge: Push back on symbolic cuts to budgets and resources that damage organizational capability and the employee value proposition.
Calibrate: Work with legal and compliance to design approaches that are robust under new scrutiny without abandoning the underlying goals.
Continue: Keep doing the quiet, systemic work (e.g., fair pay, inclusive hiring, psychologically safe cultures), even if the language or branding evolves.

DEI may be less visible on corporate homepages than it was a year or two ago, but it is not dead. For HR, the question is not whether the function still has a role but whether it is prepared to play a braver, more strategic one: holding the line on equity and inclusion not as “nice to have” initiatives but as core to organizational success in a more polarized world.

Editor’s Note: Additional Content

For more information and resources related to this article, see the pages below, which offer quick access to all WorldatWork content on these topics: