For WorldatWork Members
- Around the Globe, December 2025-January 2026, Workspan Magazine article
- India Launches $11 Billion Incentive Compensation Plan to Create Jobs, Workspan Magazine article
- The Next 70, Workspan Magazine article
For Everyone
- How New Labor Codes in India Will Reshape Total Rewards Strategies, Workspan Daily article
- WorldatWork India Conference Provided Views into Total Rewards’ Future, Workspan Daily article
- Geographic Pay Strategies, course
- Business Acumen and Communication Strategies in Total Rewards, course
A compensation committee reviews its annual rewards proposal ahead of the new financial year. The numbers are competitive, the benefits are comprehensive and the increments align with market benchmarks. Yet, the discussion quickly shifts from affordability to effectiveness. Are these investments improving retention in critical roles? Are they accelerating skill development? Are they supporting productivity in a workplace increasingly enabled by artificial intelligence (AI)?
Across India (and in other parts of the world), similar conversations are playing out in boardrooms and HR leadership forums. Total rewards (TR) is no longer evaluated solely on competitiveness or compliance. It is increasingly assessed on its ability to direct scarce resources toward future capability, sustainable performance and workforce resilience.
This shift marks a turning point for HR and TR leaders in 2026. Rewards strategies designed for scale, uniformity and incremental growth are struggling to keep pace with an environment defined by skills volatility, regulatory change, cost pressure and rising employee expectations. The result is a growing recognition that rewards must be redesigned — not expanded — to remain effective.
This article examines why traditional rewards approaches are under strain, what is breaking down and how organizations — in India and elsewhere — can reshape rewards to be more future-ready.
Why Traditional Models Are Reaching Their Limits
For years, rewards structures in India evolved through accumulation. Salary bands expanded, benefits were added in response to employee demand and variable pay plans grew more complex. While each addition was often justified in isolation, the overall architecture became harder to explain, manage and evaluate.
Several structural pressures have exposed these limitations, including:
- Economic discipline. Margin pressure and productivity scrutiny have intensified expectations that people investments deliver measurable value.
- Skills disruption. Rapid advances in digital and AI capabilities have shortened skill half-lives, making role-based pay structures less relevant.
- Regulatory evolution. Labor codes and governance expectations have forced organizations to reassess compensation design and compliance simultaneously.
- Employee awareness. Greater transparency and mobility have increased scrutiny of pay equity, differentiation and fairness.
In this context, rewards models that rely on broad-based increases and standardized programs struggle to explain why certain roles, skills or contributions warrant higher investment.
From Broad Increases to Targeted Value Creation
One of the clearest shifts emerging in 2026 is a move away from undifferentiated rewards actions toward intentional, targeted investment.
Rather than asking how to distribute increments evenly, organizations are increasingly asking:
- Which roles and capabilities are most critical to future performance?
- Where does rewards spend have the strongest impact on retention and productivity?
- Which investments can be reduced or redesigned without eroding trust?
This has led to more visible differentiation, particularly in skill-intensive and high-impact roles. While such differentiation can be uncomfortable, organizations that communicate the rationale clearly are finding it more sustainable than across-the-board actions that dilute impact.
The emphasis is shifting from “competitive everywhere” to “deliberate where it matters most.”
The Acceleration of Skills-Based Rewards
As jobs evolve faster than traditional role definitions, skills have emerged as the most reliable indicator of value creation. In response, many organizations in India are accelerating the shift toward skills-based rewards frameworks.
This does not mean abandoning job architecture. Instead, it involves layering skills intelligence onto existing structures to:
- Identify enterprise-critical skills;
- Create visible recognition for skill depth, breadth and application; and,
- Link skill development to progression and reward outcomes.
In practice, this allows organizations to reward employees who acquire and apply scarce capabilities, even when their formal role hasn’t changed. For employees, it provides clearer signals about what skills are valued and how growth translates into tangible outcomes.
Rebalancing Pay Mix and Benefits Design
Another area under review is the composition of TR itself. Fixed pay, variable incentives and benefits often have evolved independently, resulting in misalignment between cost and impact.
In 2026, organizations are reassessing:
- Whether variable pay plans genuinely influence performance or simply function as deferred pay;
- Whether benefits are aligned to employee life stages and usage patterns; and,
- How regulatory requirements affect overall compensation architecture.
There is growing interest in simplifying structures, introducing choice-based benefits and ensuring incentives align more closely with outcomes rather than activity. The objective is not to reduce rewards but make them more understandable and defensible.
Pay Equity and Transparency as Strategic Issues
Pay equity has moved beyond compliance in India. Employees increasingly expect organizations to explain how pay decisions are made and how fairness is ensured across gender, location and role.
In response, organizations are investing in:
- More frequent equity diagnostics;
- Clear articulation of pay philosophy; and,
- Manager capability to handle pay conversations confidently.
Transparency in this context doesn’t imply uniform outcomes. It requires clarity of logic, particularly when differentiation is necessary. Organizations that fail to provide this clarity risk erosion of trust, even when pay levels are competitive.
Well-Being Embedded in Rewards Design
Well-being has become a material business issue rather than a peripheral benefit. Rising burnout, caregiving responsibilities and financial stress are affecting attendance, engagement and productivity.
Rather than launching additional programs, leading organizations are embedding well-being into rewards design through:
- Benefits aligned to actual usage and need;
- Financial well-being components integrated into compensation structures; and,
- Leadership accountability for sustainable performance expectations.
This reflects a broader recognition that rewards influence not just attraction and retention, but also how work is experienced.
Using Data to Improve Decisions, Not Just Reporting
The availability of workforce data has expanded significantly, but the focus in 2026 is shifting from reporting to decision support.
High-impact applications include:
- Identifying attrition risk in critical talent segments;
- Testing the effectiveness of reward interventions; and,
- Redirecting spend toward elements that demonstrably influence outcomes.
The emphasis is on practicality, using data to inform clearer tradeoffs rather than building complex analytical models with limited adoption.
The Evolving Role of HR and Rewards Leaders
Underlying these shifts is a change in expectations for HR and TR leadership. The role is increasingly viewed as one of allocating people capital, not administering programs.
This role shift requires:
- Comfort with prioritization and tradeoffs;
- Fluency in business and financial language; and,
- Willingness to challenge legacy practices that no longer deliver value.
Looking Ahead
As organizations in India and elsewhere move through 2026, rewards strategies that succeed will be those that connect pay, skills, well-being and performance into a coherent system. Fragmented approaches, however generous, are proving insufficient.
Future-ready rewards are defined less by how much is spent and more by how intentionally resources are deployed. Organizations that adapt will find rewards becoming a source of clarity and alignment. Those that don’t adapt may continue to invest heavily without seeing the anticipated returns.
Editor’s Note: Additional Content
For more information and resources related to this article, see the pages below, which offer quick access to all WorldatWork content on these topics:
#1 Total Rewards & Comp Newsletter
Subscribe to Workspan Weekly and always get the latest news on compensation and Total Rewards delivered directly to you. Never miss another update on the newest regulations, court decisions, state laws and trends in the field.
