For WorldatWork Members
- Why Executive Compensation Is Following the Crowd and Why That Matters, Workspan Magazine article
- SEC Pay-Versus-Performance Disclosure: Is It Valued or Is It Costly Information Overload? Journal of Total Rewards article
- The Next Steps in Evaluating Executive Pay vs. Performance, Journal of Total Rewards article
- Retain Your CEO, or Boost Post-Exit Stability, With These TR Tactics, Workspan Daily Plus+ article
- Compensation Committee Toolkit, tool
For Everyone
- SEC Proposes Big Rule Change for Public Company Reporting, Workspan Daily article
- Divergent Perspectives Emerge at SEC Executive Comp Roundtable, Workspan Daily article
- Your Company Triggered an SEC Clawback. Now What? Workspan Daily article
- Companies Are Increasingly Pinning Executive Comp to HR Metrics, Workspan Daily article
- Executive Compensation Immersion Program, education
- Essentials of Executive Compensation, course
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 19 published proposed rule changes that aim to:
- Simplify public company financial disclosures;
- Significantly reduce executive compensation reporting obligations;
- Lower corporate compliance costs; and,
- Encourage businesses to go public and remain listed.
The proposed reforms, which were included in the May 21 Federal Register, represent the most significant overhaul of the public company reporting and capital-raising framework in two decades. The public may comment on the proposals through July 20.
Two SEC documents cover the proposed changes to 17 CFR Parts 210, 229, 230, 232, 239, 240 and 249:
- “Registered Offering Reform,” Release Nos. 33-11418; 34-105513; IC-36160; File No. S7-2026-17
- “Enhancement of Emerging Growth Company Accommodations and Simplification of Filer Status for Reporting Companies,” Release Nos. 33-11419; 34-105515; File No. S7-2026-18
Simplifying the Filing System
The proposals seek to consolidate the current multi-tiered filer system into two primary categories (see below) that are dictated by a company’s two-year average public float (the total number of corporate shares available to be actively bought and sold by the general public).
|
Category |
Definition |
Repercussion |
|
Large, accelerated filers (LAFs) |
Companies with a public float that is greater than $2 billion. |
LAFs will remain subject to the current, comprehensive proxy reporting rules. |
|
Non-accelerated filers (NAFs) |
Companies with a public float that is less than $2 billion. |
NAFs will be subject to substantially reduced disclosure requirements. |
Given the defined threshold, the SEC estimates approximately 80% of all public companies will be eligible for simplified disclosure. However, major market entities — including nearly all companies in the S&P 500 and S&P 400 — will remain classified as LAFs and continue to follow full disclosure requirements.
In a move to entice shifts from private status, newly public companies would be subject to the reduced disclosure rules for a full 60 months, even if their public float exceeds $2 billion. The current “seasoning” period is 12 months.
Reducing Compensation Disclosure for NAFs
For those that qualify as NAFs, the proposed rules (in Release No. 33-11419) introduce extensive cuts to executive compensation obligations. If adopted, NAFs will no longer need to hold recurring shareholder advisory votes on executive pay (e.g., “say on pay,” “say on pay frequency,” “say on golden parachute”), and will face the following reduced disclosure obligations (see below).
|
Disclosure |
Proposed Obligations/Changes |
|
Pay history |
Disclose just two years of pay history for executives in the Summary Compensation Table, down from the current three-year requirement. |
|
Named executive officers (NEOs) |
Disclose compensation details for only three NEOs, rather than the currently mandated five. |
|
Compensation details |
Omit the Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A) section of the proxy entirely. |
|
Performance and pay ratio |
Remove disclosures regarding CEO pay ratio and “pay vs. performance.” |
|
Risk disclosures |
Omit the dedicated compensation risk disclosures. |
|
Compensation tables |
Eliminate several detailed proxy tables (i.e., Pension Benefits, Grant of Plan-Based Awards, Option Exercises and Stock Vested, and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation). |
|
Payouts |
Eliminate requirement to quantify potential payments at termination or change-in-control (the narrative disclosure is still required). |
Exploring the Past and Future
SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins commented on the proposals’ noteworthiness in a published statement.
“These proposals build upon the legislative and regulatory concepts that have proven successful in the past and aim to extend that success to more companies — particularly small and mid-sized companies — and incentivize them to go and stay public,” he said. “The current public company regulatory framework is in dire need of a comprehensive overhaul. Over the past 25 years, layers upon layers of legislative changes and SEC rules have created many different categories of public companies with complex, overlapping requirements and benefits. … Similarly, many of the current SEC rules governing public offerings have not been updated in over 20 years, unnecessarily constraining public companies’ ability to raise crucial capital in the public markets quickly. … Today’s proposed rulemakings … are among the first important steps toward transforming the SEC’s regulatory framework for public companies.”
As a reminder, the changes are currently just proposals, and verbiage edits could occur following the comment period. However, it is likely prudent for companies and HR professionals to begin evaluating how the amendments would affect their future proxy disclosure and compensation governance practices.
If and when finalized, the changes would be significant for many HR, finance and legal teams at public companies, since the amount of time that executive compensation-focused professionals currently devote to CD&A development, CEO pay ratio and pay vs. performance calculations, and related disclosure controls likely would be cut.
Editor’s Note: Additional Content
For more information and resources related to this article, see the pages below, which offer quick access to all WorldatWork content on these topics:
#1 Total Rewards & Comp Newsletter
Subscribe to Workspan Weekly and always get the latest news on compensation and Total Rewards delivered directly to you. Never miss another update on the newest regulations, court decisions, state laws and trends in the field.
