For WorldatWork Members
- Compliance Checklist When Vetting a New State for Business Expansion, Workspan Daily Plus+ article
- Engage Community, peer engagement and connection platform
- FLSA Implementation Toolkit, tool
- State Laws Comparison Tool, tool
For Everyone
- What Will 2026 Mean for Employment Law Compliance? Workspan Daily article
- FTC Pulls Appeals, Puts Nail in Coffin of 2024 Noncompete Rule, Workspan Daily article
- The Status of Noncompetes in a New U.S. Political Landscape, Workspan Daily article
- Noncompete Legislation Momentum Continues at the State Level, Workspan Daily article
- Noncompete Agreements: The Current State at the State Level, Workspan Daily article
- Trade Secret Protection Strategies in Lieu of Noncompetes, Workspan Daily article
On March 23, Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson signed Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1155, which bans nearly all noncompete agreements for employees and independent contractors in the state, effective June 30, 2027.
Washington became the seventh state with a comprehensive ban on noncompetes, joining California, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Wyoming. Eight other states (Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Oregon, Rhode Island and Virginia) and Washington, D.C., significantly restrict them, with legislation primarily focused on income thresholds.
The new law in Washington:
- Builds on a 2019 state law that limited noncompete agreements to workers earning more than $100,000 (updated in 2024 to $120,559,99 for workers and $301,399.98 for independent contractors).
- Applies to noncompetes signed before or after June 30, 2027.
- Declares almost all current and future noncompetition covenants void and unenforceable.
- Covers any written or oral agreement that prohibits or restrains an employee or independent contractor from engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business.
- Requires employers to provide written notice to workers by Oct. 1, 2027, informing them their old noncompete agreements are no longer enforceable.
- Voids agreements with employees and independent contractors that restrict them from working in their field after leaving a position.
- Prohibits employers from enforcing, threatening or even suggesting a noncompete applies to the employment relationship.
- Prevents “stay or pay” restrictions that require workers to pay back training costs or bonuses if they leave, with narrow exceptions for education expenses.
- Stipulates that violations can trigger lawsuits, with penalties of $5,000 or actual damages, plus attorney fees.
- Does not affect agreements that protect confidential information, trade secrets or inventions.
- Does not apply to “sale-of-business” agreements (where an individual sells or acquires at least 1% of a company), certain franchisee transactions and certain narrowly drafted nonsolicitation agreements.
Next Steps
Law firms are advising employers in the state of Washington to:
- Examine their current employment covenants (as well as related offer letters, contractor agreements, etc.) to pinpoint whether any stated provisions/stipulations may qualify as a noncompete under the new law’s definition.
- Work with internal or external legal counsel to understand whether the organization’s legitimate (under the new law) confidentiality/trade secrets agreements and finite nonsolicitation pacts adequately cover their legitimate business interests.
- Start formulating notification plans for current and former employees/contractors, since employers must “make reasonable efforts to provide written notice” by Oct. 1, 2027.
Editor’s Note: Additional Content
For more information and resources related to this article, see the pages below, which offer quick access to all WorldatWork content on these topics:
#1 Total Rewards & Comp Newsletter
Subscribe to Workspan Weekly and always get the latest news on compensation and Total Rewards delivered directly to you. Never miss another update on the newest regulations, court decisions, state laws and trends in the field.
