EEOC Rule to Rescind Data Reporting Takes Step Toward Finalization

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on Monday, Nov. 9, submitted a finalized rule to the White House that would eliminate longstanding federal requirements for covered employers to report workforce demographic data. WorldatWork has been reporting on this subject since the commission first submitted a proposed rule in May.

The White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review the EEOC’s final rule. If approved and published in the Federal Register, the regulation would end mandatory annual EEO-1 filings, which require private employers with 100 or more employees and certain federal contractors to submit workforce data broken down by race, ethnicity, sex and job classification. According to data from the Census Bureau’s Statistics of U.S. Businesses, more than 110,000 private companies in the U.S. currently employ 100 or more workers.

Beyond the EEO-1 form, the finalized rule also seeks to remove EEO-2, EEO-3, EEO-4 and EEO-5 reporting obligations, which apply to apprenticeship committees, labor unions, state and local governments, and public school systems. (Note: The EEO-2 reporting process is currently inactive.)

Proponents of the reporting rollback, including EEOC chair Andrea Lucas, have argued that mandatory demographic data collection places an unnecessary administrative burden on businesses and can be misused by employers to initiate unlawful race- or sex-conscious hiring and diversity incentives that violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The agency’s push to end demographic reporting has coincided with broader EEOC actions this year that have targeted corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and rescinded decades-old affirmative action hiring guidance.

Conversely, civil rights advocates and some legal experts have raised concerns about eliminating this data collection requirement for employers, which dates back to the 1960s. Critics warn that without routine, standardized workforce data, the Department of Labor, federal agencies such as the EEOC and research bodies will face major hurdles in identifying systemic patterns of workplace discrimination and hamper subsequent enforcement investigations.

Regardless of the EEOC rule’s outcome, employment attorneys note that employers operating in certain jurisdictions still will face compliance obligations. Independent state-level demographic and pay data reporting mandates remain active in states such as California, Illinois, Massachusetts and New York. In addition, Title VII recordkeeping rules still require data preservation, so internal demographic self-identification or data-collection systems should remain intact.

Beyond those requirements, data reporting remains a leading practice since:

Regular demographic reviews help identify potential disparities in hiring, compensation, promotion and termination before they become claims;
Demographic information informs meaningful pay equity analyses; and,
Historical workforce data can help your organization evaluate and defend discrimination allegations by demonstrating legitimate business reasons for employment decisions.

Editor’s Note: Additional Content

For more information and resources related to this article, see the pages below, which offer quick access to all WorldatWork content on these topics: