What can we help you with today?
Filter by Topics
Filter by Category
Found 477 results
Journal Article
08/23/2024
In quantifying this alignment, we focus on companies in Quadrant 2 and 3, assigning a positive value to those in Quadrant 2 and a negative value to those in Quadrant 3.
Author(s):
Journal Article
05/31/2024
(McKinsey, LeanIn.org. 2023) 2.
Author(s):
Journal Article
05/31/2024
MIS Quarterly 19(2): 213.
Author(s):
Course
Recertification Course Credits
WorldatWork Recertification Credits
2 General Credits
CEUs
0.2 Credits
HRCI Recertification
2 Credits
SHRM Recertification
2 Credits
Learning Options
Exercises are included throughout each section of the course for hands-on practice.
Research
02/28/2021
Member Only Access Member Only Access
1,798
Responses
2/21
Date fielded
2%
Margin of error for employee responses
3%
Margin of error for employer responses
Thank You for Being a Member
Get the most from your membership today!
Journal Article
06/11/2021
Table 2 shows major advantages and disadvantages of cash rewards.
Author(s):
Webinar
02/10/2026
Schedule 2:00 - 2:30 PM Eastern 2:30 - 3:00 PM Eastern 3:00 - 3:30 PM Eastern 3:30 - 4:00 PM Eastern 4:00 - 4:30 PM Eastern 4:30 - 5:00 PM Eastern
Please indicate "Yes" or "No" if you consent to WorldatWork sharing your contact information with the webinar sponsor?
Workspan Daily
01/15/2026
Access a bonus Workspan Daily Plus+ article on this subject: Two TR Leaders Provide a Personal Take on Their 2026 Priorities;
WorldatWork’s 2026 findings are based on the survey responses (from Oct. 27 through Nov. 21) of 290 TR leaders, including:
;Directors or senior directors (37%);
;Managers or senior managers (27%);
;Vice presidents (senior or assistant) (15%);
;Consultants/analysts/specialists (11%);
;Chiefs or heads (6%);
;Other titles (3%);
Respondents represented a diversity of:
;Organization sizes
;500 to 2,499 employees (29%);
;2,500 to 9,999 (27%);
;20 to 499 (18%);
;20,000 or more (16%);
;10,000 to 19,999 (8%);
;Less than 20 (3%);;
;And, geographic regions;;United States (41%);
;Canada (14%);
;Europe (excluding the United Kingdom) (8%);
;U.K. (8%);
;India (8%);
;Asia (excluding India) (7%);
;Latin America and the Caribbean (6%);
;Middle East (4%);
;Africa (2%);
;Oceania (2%);;
“TR leaders recognize that rewards programs must directly support organizational
Author(s):
Tools
Illustration of Potential Long-Term Incentive Mix Change;Pay Mix Considerations;Pay Mix Examples;Executive Compensation Philosophy;
Governance
Compensation Committee Calendar;Compensation Committee Charter 1;Compensation Committee Charter 2;Compensation Committee Charter 3;Board of Directors Compensation Committee – Self-Assessment Questionnaire 1;Board of Directors Compensation Committee – Self-Assessment Questionnaire 2;Charter Review;Compensation Committee Agenda Best Practices;Compensation Committee Agenda Items Checklist;
Risk and Compensation
Compensation Risk Assessment Process;Example Of Risk Assessment Review;Getting the Most Out of Your Company’s Compensation Risk Assessment;How We Discourage Imprudent Risk Taking;Risk Related to Executive Compensation;Sample Risk Assessment Presentation;
Proxy Disclosure
Tools
Pay Range Overlap (%)=Max(Range 1 Max, Range 2 Max) - Min(Range 1 Min, Range 2 Min)Min(Range 1 Max, Range 2 Max) - Max(Range 1 Min, Range 2 Min)×100 Min (Range 1 Max, Range 2 Max): The lower of the two maximums.